Table 1. Study quality checklist with quality scores assigned
| Authors/Date |
Que 1 |
Que 2 |
Que 3 |
Que 4 |
Que 5 |
Que 6 |
Quality score total/6 |
| Grant (1992) |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
| Carlson (1995) |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
| Curnow & MacDonald (1995) |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
| Alexander et al. (1996) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Carlson & Hastie (1997) |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
| Hastie (1998a) |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
| Hastie (1998b) |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
5 |
| Alexander & Luckman (2001) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Hastie & Trost (2002) |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
| Clarke & Quill (2003) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Browne et al. (2004) |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
| Hastie & Curtner-Smith (2006) |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
| Hastie & Sinelnikov (2006) |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
5 |
| Cruz (2008) |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
| Pritchard et al. (2008) |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
5 |
| Brock et al. (2009) |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
| Li & Cruz (2009) |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
| Hastie, Sinelnikov & Guarino (2009) |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
5 |
| Calderón, Hastie & Martinez (2010) |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
3 |
| Mesquita, Farias & Hastie (2012) |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
| Cho et al. (2012) |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
5 |
| Gutiérrez et al. (2013) |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
3 |
| Hastie et al. (2013) |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
6 |
Question (Que). Que 1: Did the article provide a detailed description of the program context: teacher expertise and students previous experience? Que 2: Did the study report the sources and details of outcome assessment? Que 3: Did outcome assessment instruments have acceptable reliability for the specific age group? Que 4: Did the study report the precise details of the interventions intended for each group and how and when they were actually administered? Que 5: Did the study report the precise fidelity of the intervention that was delivered to participants and was the delivered content in the true nature of the intended intervention? Que 6: Did the study report the effect size of primary and secondary outcome investigation?
