Table 1. Statistical comparison of the results obtained by proposed methods: the trajectories directly measured with marker-based stereophotogrammetry system (MBS); the trajectories estimated from stereophotogrammetric data applying the kinematic chain model (KMS); the trajectory estimated from inertial sensors data applying the same model (3DIMMU).
MBS vs KMS MBS vs 3DIMMU KMS vs 3DIMMU
RMSE (cm) 4.5 7.7 6.6
90% percentile of absolute error (cm) 6.9 12.4 10.3
Correlation (r) 0.99 0.94 0.93
Absolute Bias (cm) -1.6 -2.9 -1.3
3d mean distance (cm) 7.8 (±1.7) 13.0 (±4.5) 10.8 (±3.2)
nPVI 0.53 (±0.51) 0.79 (±0.57) 0.26 (±0.26)