Table 1. Effects of music timing on fatigue perception, performance, and physiological changes
|
Plank-hold
(n =12) |
|
Wall-sit
(n =12) |
p-value |
η2p |
MEE |
MDF |
CON |
p-value |
η2p |
MEE |
MDF |
CON |
TTE
(sec) |
171.0 ±
40.9* |
163.1 ±
58.3 |
144.8 ±
43.5 |
0.05 |
0.22 |
294.8 ±
117.2* |
278.7 ±
106.9^ |
222.0 ±
88.1 |
<0.01 |
0.46 |
TFP
(sec) |
105.2 ±
27.1*# |
81.2 ±
27.8 |
89.8 ±
29.4 |
0.02 |
0.30 |
137.8 ±
38.9* |
122.6 ±
45.6 |
111.8 ±
42.2 |
0.01 |
0.36 |
∆ Heart
rate (bpm) |
41.0 ±
14.0 |
38.2 ±
14.9 |
37.6 ±
9.9 |
0.44 |
0.07 |
40.5 ±
9.5 |
37 ± 11.1 |
35.8 ±
9.3 |
0.20 |
0.14 |
∆ Lactate
(mmol/L) |
1.5 ±
1.1 |
1.6 ±
0.8 |
1.4 ±
1.0 |
0.67 |
0.04 |
0.7 ±
0.5 |
0.9 ±
0.6 |
0.8 ±
0.6 |
0.78 |
0.02 |
Values are presented as the mean ± SD. ∆ Heart rate = post-exercise heart rate – baseline heart rate; ∆ Lactate = post-exercise lactate level – baseline lactate level.*p < 0.05 between MEE and CON#p < 0.05 between MEE and MDF^p < 0.05 between MDF and CON. MEE: music played during the entire exercise task; MDF: music played during fatigue only; CON: no music; TFP: Time to onset of fatigue perception; TTE: Total time to volitional exhaustion