Table 2. Methodological quality appraisal of the included studies using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.
Study Selectiona Comparabilitya Outcomeb Statistics
Representation of the sample Sample size Non-respondents Description of players Subtotal Control for most important factor (training experience) Control for other factors (starting strength or power) Subtotal Assessment of outcome Statistical test Subtotal Total (out of 10) High (>7) Mod-high (5-7) Low (<5)
Comfort et al., 2012 1 1 0 1 3 0 0 0 2 2 4 7 0 1 0
Harris et al., 2008 1 0 0 1 2 0 1 1 1 2 3 6 0 1 0
O’Connor and Crowe, 2007 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 2 4 6 0 1 0
Rogerson et al., 2007 1 0 0 1 2 0 1 1 2 2 5 7 0 1 0
de Lacey et al., 2014a 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 2 4 6 0 1 0
Daniels et al., 2019 1 1 0 1 3 0 0 0 2 2 4 7 0 1 0
Baker, 2001b 1 1 0 1 3 0 0 0 2 2 4 7 0 1 0
Crewther et al., 2011 1 1 0 1 3 0 0 0 2 2 4 7 0 1 0
Baker and Newton, 2008a 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 2 4 6 0 1 0
Baker and Newton, 2006 1 1 0 1 3 0 0 0 2 2 4 7 0 1 0
Baker and Newton, 2008b 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 2 4 6 0 1 0
Baker, 2013 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 2 4 6 0 1 0
a subscale items rated 0-1;b subscale items rated 0-2.