Table 3. Pearson’s product-moment coefficients (90% confidence interval) for different methods of quantification of the TL correlated to changes in fitness parameters from T1 to T2.
|
n |
sRPEres TL (AU) |
sRPEmus TL (AU) |
sumRPEres (AU) |
sumRPEmus (AU) |
Training Volume (min) |
| Δ (%) CMJ |
14 |
-.44 (-.77;-.04) |
-.20 (-.59;.28) |
-.43 (-.75;-.04) |
-.17 (-.59;.26) |
-.42 (-.75;.11) |
| Δ (%) CMJAS |
14 |
-.29 (-.69;.26) |
-.40 (-.69;.00) |
-.25 (-.68;.27) |
-.38 (-.68;.02) |
-.51 (-.80;.02)L |
| Δ (%) CMJD |
13 |
-.23 (-.61;.25) |
-.54 (-.87;-.13)L |
-.27 (-.64;.19) |
-.61 (-.87;-.24)L |
-.27 (-.67;.24) |
| Δ (%) CMJnD |
13 |
-.30 (-.66;.10) |
-.52 (-.75;-.17)L |
-.30 (-.66;.10) |
-.53 (-.76;-.21)L |
-.39 (-.72;.02) |
| Δ (%) 5 m |
13 |
-.37 (-.71;.01) |
-.00 (-.45;.44) |
-.34 (-.70;.06) |
.06 (-.43;.49) |
-.54 (-.82;-.15)L |
| Δ (%) 15 m |
13 |
-.49 (-.80;-.26) |
-.15 (-.55;.23) |
-.38 (-.78;-.09) |
-.02 (-.48;.37) |
-.64 (-.83;-.39)L |
| Δ (%) V3 |
14 |
-.30 (-.62;.18) |
-.45 (-.75;-.02) |
-.17 (-.52;.27) |
-.33 (-.68;.12) |
-.31 (-.70;.23) |
| Δ (%) Lac12 |
14 |
.01 (-.66;.53) |
-.29 (-.73;.18) |
.13 (-.56;.61) |
-.20 (-.67;.27) |
-.21 (-.67;.29) |
| Δ (%) Lac13 |
14 |
-.36 (-.70;.10) |
-.57 (-.87;-.09)L |
-.28 (-.61;.16) |
-.48 (-.79;.02) |
-.37 (-.74;.07) |
TL: training load; T1: test 1; T2 =test 2; sRPEres TL: respiratory session-rating of perceived exertion; sRPEmus TL: muscular session-rating of perceived exertion; sumRPEres: sum of all respiratory perceived efforts; sumRPEmus: sum of all muscular perceived efforts; CMJ: countermovement jump; CMJAS =arm swing countermovement jump; CMJD: dominant leg countermovement jump; CMJnD: non dominant countermovement jump; V
3: running velocity associated with a [La]b of 3 mmol·l
–1; La: lactate.
