Table 3. Mean (SD) of the time variables during the eccentric (tECC) and the concentric (tCON) contact phases, in Pre, Post 1 and Post 2. The statistics of the univariate repeated measures ANOVAs and the concomitant pairwise comparisons are also noted.
Variables Mean (SD) ANOVA Pairwise Comparisons
Cohen’s d effect size
(% of difference)
Pre Post 1 Post 2 F p value η2 Pre vs
Post 1		 Pre vs
Post 2		 Post 1 vs
Post 2
tCONTACT (ms) 823
(112)		 841
(169)		 819
(148)		 .33 .66 .01 .13
(+2.3)		 .03
(-.4)		 .14
(-2.6)
tECC (ms) 543
(89)		 562
(133)		 537
(108)		 .64 .49 .02 .17
(+3.4)		 .05
(-1.2)		 .21
(-4.4)
tCON (ms) 280
(34)		 279
(44)		 282
(49)		 .10 .86 .00 .03
(-.05)		 .05
(+1.0)		 .07
(+1.1)
tFzECC (ms) 182
(63)		 162
(55)		 153
(37)		 4.25 .03* .14 .34
(-11.2)		 .50*
(-16.3)		 .20
(-5.7)
tFzCON (ms) 581
(115)		 667
(186)		 622
(163)		 4.57 .02* .15 .57*
(+14.7)		 .27
(7.1)		 .26
(-6.6)
tFxECC (ms) 470
(114)		 462
(157)		 405
(130)		 2.52 .09 .09 .06
(-1.6)		 .48
(-13.7)		 .40
(-12.3)
tFxCON (ms) 756
(116)		 775
(170)		 753
(149)		 .33 .66 .03 .13
(+2.5)		 .02
(-.4)		 .14
(-2.8)
tVECC (ms)†  365
(73)		 346
(97)		 333
(65)		 2.11 .13 .08 .23
(-5.2)		 .38
(-8.7)		 .16
(-3.7)
tVCON (ms)†  793
(111)		 809
(167)		 786
(146)		 .33 .66 .01 .11
(2.0)		 .05
(-.9)		 .15
(-2.8)
tPECC1st (ms)‡ 253
(70)		 228
(77)		 221
(49)		 2.60 .08 .09 .35
(-9.6)		 .44
(-12.4)		 .11
(-3.1)
tPECC2nd (ms)‡ 475
(86)		 474
(120)		 464
(108)		 .14 .87 .01 .01
(-.1)		 .11
(-2.2)		 .09
(-2.1)
tPCON (ms)‡ 738
(115)		 756
(170)		 734
(150)		 .31 .67 .01 .13
(+2.4)		 .03
(-.5)		 .14
(-2.8)
*Significance of ANOVA and pairwise comparisons at p ≤ 0.05.†  V = Velocity,‡ P = Power1st and 2nd: the 1st and 2nd, respectively, peaks of the Power – time curve during the eccentric contact phase.