Table 3. Description of data extracted from each article regarding functional transference, in relation to subtopics: type of intervention, sample, gender, age, experience time, type of study, outcomes, main results and PEDro scale score (0-8).

Reference	Intervention	Sample (n)	Gender	Age (years)	Experience (years)	Type of study	Outcomes	Main findings	PEDro
Contreras et al. (2017)	Barbell hip thrust (HT) versus front squat (FS)	24	Male	HT:15.49±1.16 FS:15.48±0.74	Adolescent rugby and rowing athletes with a minimum of 1 year experience	Chronic (6 weeks)	Sprints of 10 and 20 meters; Vertical and horizontal jumps; Isometric mid-thigh test	Hip thrust presented better ES for sprints of 10 and 20 meters and isometric half-thigh test	8
Dello Iacono et al. (2018)	Barbell hip thrust 50%RM versus 85%RM	18	Male	19.8±0.3	Elite handball players with 2.6 ± 0.8 years of experience	Acute	10 and 15 meters sprint time	Both strategies statistically reduce the time in the measured distances	7
Bishop et al. (2017)	Barbell hip thrust versus control	21	Male and female	Intervention group: 27.36±3.17 Control group: 27.2±3.36	University athletes with at least 1 year of experience	Chronic (8 weeks)	40 meters sprint time	The hip thrust did not shorten the time on the benchmark test	7
Zweifel et al. (2017)	Barbell hip thrust versus back squat e deadlift	26	Male and female	22.15±2.2	Not quoted	Chronic (6 weeks)	10 and 40-yard sprint	Hip thrust reduced the time of the 40-yard sprint	6
Lin et al. (2017)	Barbell hip thrust versus control	20	Male	Hip thrust: 19.9±0.8 Control: 20.4±2.1	College baseball players with at least 1 year of experience	Chronic (8 weeks)	Horizontal jump; Sprint 30 meters	No significant difference reported	7
Loturco et al. (2018)	Barbell hip thrust versus vertical exercises	16	Male and female	21.8±3.0	World-class athletes	Acute	Vertical jump; Sprints of 10, 20, 40, 60, 100 and 150 meters	Performance in the hip thrust was associated with the Maximum acceleration phase	7
Dello Iacono e Seitz (2018)	Barbell hip thrusts 85%RM versus optimal power loads	18	Male	19.3±0.2	Professional soccer players with 2.1 ± 0.3 years of experience	Acute	5, 10 e 20 meters sprints	Both loads tested improved the test time, with the maximum power development load being even more efficient.	7
Williams et al. (2018)	Barbell hip thrust versus back squat and split squat	12	Male	25.0±4.0	4.0±1.0	Acute	Maximum sprints on the non-motorized treadmill; A horizontal and vertical force	Sprint peak velocity correlated with horizontal force and peak ground reaction force only in hip thrust exercise	7