Table 3. Mean ± SD of throughput scores (r·m·
1) for the ANAM protocol.
|
Familiarization |
Pre-Fatigue |
Post-Fatigue |
p-Value |
| SRT |
257.2 ± 18.6 |
251.0 ± 23.1 |
260.8 ± 24.9 |
0.231 |
| CDS |
68.2 ± 9.6 |
65.6 ± 6.4 |
66.2 ± 6.2 |
0.274 |
| PRO |
113.7 ± 10.6 |
118.3 ± 12.0 |
116.5 ± 14.3 |
0.554 |
| MTH |
26.4 ± 5.3 |
23.8 ± 7.4 |
32.0 ± 8.8* |
<0.001 |
| CDD |
65.8 ± 11.5 |
63.2 ± 9.6 |
49.3 ± 14.4* |
0.027 |
| GNG |
- |
- |
- |
- |
| SR2 |
256.1 ± 19.5# |
240.0 ± 22.3 |
240.5 ± 21.1 |
0.032 |
SRT = Simple Reaction Time ; CDS = Coded Substitution-Learning; PRO = Procedural Reaction Time; MTH = Mathematical Processing; CDD = Coded Substitution-Delay; GNG = Go/No-Go; SR2 = Simple Reaction Time 2. P-values were determined from repeated measures ANOVAs,* Indicates significant (p < 0.05) difference from pre-fatigue values as determined from post-hoc pairwise comparison.# = (p < 0.05) from pre-fatigue and post-fatigue values.SRT = Simple Reaction Time ; CDS = Coded Substitution-Learning; PRO = Procedural Reaction Time; MTH = Mathematical Processing; CDD = Coded Substitution-Delay; GNG = Go/No-Go; SR2 = Simple Reaction Time 2. P-values were determined from repeated measures ANOVAs,* Indicates significant (p < 0.05) difference from pre-fatigue values as determined from post-hoc pairwise comparison.# = (p < 0.05) from pre-fatigue and post-fatigue values.
