Table 4. Compliance of intervention and training diary. All data are presented as mean (standard deviation).
|
Intervention group |
Control group |
| All (n = 11) |
Female (n = 5) |
All (n = 9) |
Female (n = 7) |
| Compliance of strength (%) |
76 |
(9) |
79 |
(9) |
|
|
|
|
|
| Compliance of endurance (%) |
86 |
(8) |
90 |
(4) |
|
|
|
|
|
| Training volume (meters ∙ 1000) |
In total |
256.2 |
(40.7) |
258.4 |
(40.9) |
244.0 |
(52.0)7
|
227.8 |
(51.7)5
|
| 60-85% of HRmax |
122.4 |
(47.0) |
104.8 |
(51.1) |
122.2 |
(75.9)7
|
120.2 |
(53.3)5
|
| 85-95% of HRmax |
90.0 |
(23.3) |
99.2 |
(9.2) |
49.2 |
(39.7)7
|
57.1 |
(44.8)5
|
| >95% of HRmax |
27.0 |
(14.7) |
36.8 |
(13.2)† |
16.7 |
(9.7)7
|
15.9 |
(9.6)5† |
| Alternative training (min) |
|
961 |
(709)9
|
995 |
(600) |
1092 |
(636)7
|
1144 |
(686)4 |
include 7 subjects, include 5 subjects, HR: maximal heart rate, include 9 subjects, include 4 subjects, min: minutes. † Significant difference between groups at p < 0.05.
