Table 4. Results of single-subject analysis (each cell that is occupied indicates that it was significant for that particular variable).
| Subject |
Pkf |
FPmax |
FP30 |
FProm30 |
FPrommax |
VL |
VM |
MH |
LH |
GA |
| 3 F |
|
sig var |
|
|
|
|
|
↑ RMS |
|
|
| 4 F |
↓ pkf |
|
|
sig valg |
|
|
|
↑ RMS |
|
|
| 6 F |
↓ pkf |
|
|
|
|
|
|
↑ RMS |
|
|
| 7 F |
|
|
sig var |
sig var |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 9 F |
↓ pkf |
|
sig var |
sig var |
|
↑ RMS |
|
↑ RMS |
|
|
| 10 F |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 12 F |
↓ pkf |
|
sig valg |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 13 F |
↓ pkf |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
↑ RMS |
|
| 15 F |
|
sig valg |
|
|
sig valg |
|
|
|
|
|
| 19 F |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 20 F |
|
sig valg |
sig valg |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 21 F |
↓ pkf |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
↑ RMS |
|
| 22 F |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
↓ RMS |
|
| 23 F |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 5 M |
|
|
sig valg |
|
sig valg |
|
|
↑ RMS |
↑ RMS |
|
| 8 M |
↓ pkf |
|
sig var |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 16 M |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 17 M |
↓ pkf |
sig var |
sig var |
|
sig var |
|
|
|
|
↑ RMS |
| 24 M |
|
|
|
sig var |
|
|
↓ RMS |
|
|
|
| 26 M |
↓ pkf |
|
|
|
|
↑ RMS |
|
|
|
↑ RMS |
| 28 M |
|
|
sig valg |
sig var |
|
↑ RMS |
|
|
|
|
| 29 M |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 33 M |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 35 M |
↓ pkf |
sig valg |
sig valg |
sig valg |
|
|
|
↓ RMS |
|
| 36 M |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
↑ RMS |
|
| 37 M |
|
|
sig valg |
|
|
|
|
|
↑ RMS |
|
↓ indicates a significant decrease in that variable, ↑ indicates a significant increase in that variable, sig var = significant in the varus direction, sig valg = significant in the valgus direction.