Table 4. Results of single-subject analysis (each cell that is occupied indicates that it was significant for that particular variable).
Subject |
Pkf |
FPmax |
FP30 |
FProm30 |
FPrommax |
VL |
VM |
MH |
LH |
GA |
3 F |
|
sig var |
|
|
|
|
|
↑ RMS |
|
|
4 F |
↓ pkf |
|
|
sig valg |
|
|
|
↑ RMS |
|
|
6 F |
↓ pkf |
|
|
|
|
|
|
↑ RMS |
|
|
7 F |
|
|
sig var |
sig var |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 F |
↓ pkf |
|
sig var |
sig var |
|
↑ RMS |
|
↑ RMS |
|
|
10 F |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 F |
↓ pkf |
|
sig valg |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 F |
↓ pkf |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
↑ RMS |
|
15 F |
|
sig valg |
|
|
sig valg |
|
|
|
|
|
19 F |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 F |
|
sig valg |
sig valg |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 F |
↓ pkf |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
↑ RMS |
|
22 F |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
↓ RMS |
|
23 F |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 M |
|
|
sig valg |
|
sig valg |
|
|
↑ RMS |
↑ RMS |
|
8 M |
↓ pkf |
|
sig var |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 M |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 M |
↓ pkf |
sig var |
sig var |
|
sig var |
|
|
|
|
↑ RMS |
24 M |
|
|
|
sig var |
|
|
↓ RMS |
|
|
|
26 M |
↓ pkf |
|
|
|
|
↑ RMS |
|
|
|
↑ RMS |
28 M |
|
|
sig valg |
sig var |
|
↑ RMS |
|
|
|
|
29 M |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33 M |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 M |
↓ pkf |
sig valg |
sig valg |
sig valg |
|
|
|
↓ RMS |
|
36 M |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
↑ RMS |
|
37 M |
|
|
sig valg |
|
|
|
|
|
↑ RMS |
|
↓ indicates a significant decrease in that variable, ↑ indicates a significant increase in that variable, sig var = significant in the varus direction, sig valg = significant in the valgus direction.