Table 4. Mean ± SD reaction times (ms) for the ANAM protocol.
|
Familiarization (ms) |
Pre-Fatigue (ms) |
Post-Fatigue (ms) |
p-Value |
SRT |
234.4 ± 17.6 |
241.1 ± 24.0 |
232.0 ± 22.3 |
0.263 |
CDS |
858.8 ± 146.7 |
590.6 ± 86.1 |
859.7 ± 89.9 |
0.406 |
PRO |
510.9 ± 58.3 |
494.6 ± 61.1 |
500.6 ± 54.6 |
0.54 |
MTH |
2253.7 ± 567.6 |
2518.2 ± 884.8 |
1885.2 ± 582.8* |
<0.001 |
CDD |
881.1 ± 113.8 |
937.9 ± 139.2 |
1104.4 ± 294.0 |
0.078 |
GNG |
296.0 ± 15.9 |
298.5 ± 12.1 |
285.9 ± 16.3* |
0.031 |
SR2 |
235.5 ± 18.7# |
252.0 ± 24.3 |
251.3 ± 23.5 |
0.042 |
# = (p< 0.05) from pre-fatigue and post-fatigue values.SRT = Simple Reaction Time ; CDS = Coded Substitution-Learning; PRO = Procedural Reaction Time; MTH = Mathematical Processing; CDD = Coded Substitution-Delay; GNG = Go/No-Go; SR2 = Simple Reaction Time 2. P-values were determined from repeated measures ANOVAs,* Indicates significant (p < 0.05) difference from pre-fatigue values as determined from post-hoc pairwise comparisons.SRT = Simple Reaction Time ; CDS = Coded Substitution-Learning; PRO = Procedural Reaction Time; MTH = Mathematical Processing; CDD = Coded Substitution-Delay; GNG = Go/No-Go; SR2 = Simple Reaction Time 2. P-values were determined from repeated measures ANOVAs,* Indicates significant (p < 0.05) difference from pre-fatigue values as determined from post-hoc pairwise comparisons.# = (p< 0.05) from pre-fatigue and post-fatigue values.