Table 6. Point-biserial correlations between each talent criterion (raw and corrected test scores) and the adult performance level (professional vs. non-professional; N = 121).
Type of correction |
Talent criterion |
Sprint* |
Jumping |
Yo-Yo |
Agility* |
Dribbling* |
Passing* |
Juggling |
Shooting |
None (raw scores) |
–.24 |
.02 |
.13 |
–.16 |
–.26 |
–.15 |
.20 |
–.18 |
Mirwald |
–.20 |
–.03 |
.10 |
–.13 |
–.24 |
–.13 |
— |
— |
Moore-1 |
–.20 |
–.03 |
.10 |
–.12 |
–.24 |
–.13 |
— |
— |
Moore-2 |
–.23 |
–.02 |
.12 |
–.14 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
Fransen-1 |
–.20 |
–.03 |
.10 |
–.12 |
–.24 |
–.12 |
— |
— |
Fransen-2 |
–.20 |
–.03 |
.10 |
–.12 |
–.24 |
–.12 |
— |
— |
%PAH |
–.13 |
–.06 |
.07 |
–.10 |
–.22 |
–.11 |
— |
— |
%RAH |
–.29 |
.01 |
.13 |
–.16 |
–.26 |
— |
— |
— |
Each cell represents the correlation between adult performance level and scores in a test (corrected or uncorrected). For example, the value in the last cell of the first column (r = –.29) represents the correlation between adult performance level and scores in the sprint test corrected according to %RAH. Yo-Yo = Level 1 Yo-Yo intermittent recovery test; %PAH = attained percentage of the predicted adult height; %RAH = attained percentage of the real adult height. — = not needed since the correlation between motor performance test and maturity indicator was not significant in Table 5. Coding of the adult performance level (0 = non-professional, 1 = professional). Measurement units: seconds (sprint, agility, dribbling, passing), centimeters (jumping), meters (Yo-Yo), and points (shooting, juggling). Critical value of Pearson’s r ( = 5%, one-tailed, df = 119): |r
crit| = 0.15. *Motor tasks with reverse coding (the shorter the time needed, the faster and the better).