Research article - (2026)25, 514 - 528
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52082/jssm.2026.514
Comparative Effects Of 1V1 Vs 3V3 Small-Sided Basketball Training On Body Anthropometric-Related Outcomes And Physical Fitness In Sedentary Female College Students: An 8-Week Randomized Controlled Trial
Lu Li1, Xinjie Han1, Jiawei Chen2, Qingpan Wen1, Gustavo De Conti Teixeira Costa3, Robert Trybulski4,5, Filipe Manuel Clemente1,6,7,
1Department of Biomechanics and Sport Engineering, Gdansk University of Physical Education and Sport, Gdansk, Poland
2Hunan Mechanical and Electrical Vocational Technical College,
3Physical Education Department, Federal University of Goiás, Goiás, Goiânia, Brazil
4Faculty of Medicine, Katowice Business University, Katowice, Poland
5Provita Żory Medical Center, Żory, Poland
6Applied Research Institute (i2A), Polytechnic University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
7Sport Physical Activity and Health Research & Innovation Center, Coimbra, Portugal

Filipe Manuel Clemente
✉ Applied Research Institute (i2A), Polytechnic University of Coimbra, 3045-601 Coimbra, Portugal
Email: filipe.clemente5@gmail.com
Received: 16-04-2026 -- Accepted: 31-05-2026
Published (online): 01-06-2026
Narrated in English

ABSTRACT

This randomized controlled trial compared the effects of 1v1 and 3v3 basketball small-sided games (SSGs) on body anthropometric-related outcomes and physical fitness in sedentary female college students. Sixty-three sedentary female university students aged 18-21 years were randomized to 1v1 SSGs (n = 21), 3v3 SSGs (n = 21), or a non-training control group (n = 21) for 8 weeks. Training was performed three times per week, with each 60-min session including 40 min of SSG play. Outcomes were assessed at baseline, week 4, and week 8. All randomized participants completed the scheduled assessments, with no missing outcome cases. Adherence was 94.5% in the 1v1 group and 92.8% in the 3v3 group. The primary outcome was 20-m multistage fitness test distance. Secondary outcomes included body mass, body mass index, waist circumference, hip circumference, waist-to-hip ratio, the sum of skinfold thicknesses, handgrip strength, vertical jump height, and standing long jump distance. Linear mixed-effects models including group, time, and group × time were used to estimate longitudinal intervention effects. The primary outcome improved more in both intervention groups than in the control group. The 20-m multistage fitness test distance increased by 29.1% in the 1v1 group and 35.3% in the 3v3 group, compared with 1.1% in the control group; the model-estimated differences in baseline-to-week 8 change versus control were 120.95 m for 1v1 and 151.43 m for 3v3, with both Holm-adjusted p values < 0.001. Body mass decreased by 6.8% in the 1v1 group and 8.2% in the 3v3 group, compared with 0.8% in the control group. The corresponding differences in baseline-to-week 8 change versus control were -3.45 kg for 1v1 and -4.18 kg for 3v3, both with Holm-adjusted p values < 0.001. The sum of skinfold thicknesses decreased by 10.6% in the 1v1 group and 12.2% in the 3v3 group, compared with 0.4% in the control group (p values < 0.001). Secondary fitness outcomes also improved more in the intervention groups than in the control group, including handgrip strength, vertical jump height, and standing long jump distance. The 3v3 format showed larger exploratory gains than 1v1 in vertical jump height and standing long jump distance, whereas direct between-format differences for multistage fitness test distance and handgrip strength were not statistically significant. Eight weeks of recreational basketball SSGs improved cardiorespiratory fitness, several adiposity-related indicators, and neuromuscular fitness in sedentary female college students. These findings support basketball SSGs as a reasonable university-based exercise strategy, although between-format comparisons should be interpreted cautiously because they were exploratory. Future studies should test these formats in larger multicenter samples, include longer-term follow-up, and incorporate dietary/free-living activity monitoring and direct training-load measures to clarify sustainability, mechanisms, and format-specific effects.

Key words: aerobic capacity, neuromuscular adaptation, exercise intensity, health

Key Points
  • Both 1v1 and 3v3 basketball small-sided games improved the primary outcome, 20-m multistage fitness test distance, compared with the non-training control condition after 8 weeks. The increase was 29.1% in the 1v1 group and 35.3% in the 3v3 group, compared with 1.1% in the control group.
  • Both intervention formats produced favorable changes in several anthropometric and body-composition outcomes, including body mass, body mass index, waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio, and the sum of skinfold thicknesses. The corrected analysis did not support the previous statement that all anthropometric intervention-versus-control comparisons were significant at p < 0.001, because the 3v3-versus-control contrast for hip circumference was not statistically significant.
  • Both formats improved neuromuscular fitness outcomes compared with control, including handgrip strength, vertical jump height, and standing long jump distance. Exploratory direct comparisons suggested larger gains in vertical jump height and standing long jump distance after 3v3 than 1v1, whereas between-format differences for multistage fitness test distance and handgrip strength were not statistically significant.








Back
|
Full Text
|
PDF
|
Share