TComparing the initial exercise response of a constant workload submaximal test in children to other individuals has most typically resulted in comparing children to adults (Armon et al., 1991; Fawkner, et al., 2002; Hebestreit, et al., 1998; Williams et al., 2001; Zanconato, et al. 1991) or children to older youth (Cooper et al., 1985). Limited research effort has examined diseased (Mocellin et al., 1999) or severely overweight youth (Cooper et al., 1990). The protocol used in the current study was adopted from a series of studies by Cooper and colleagues (Armon et al., 1991; Cooper et al., 1985; Zanconato et al. 1991). We observed no differences (p < 0.05) in phase I or t kinetic responses when comparing severely overweight female youth to normal weight female youth. In the work of Cooper and colleagues the investigators compared the O2 kinetic response in children to youth or adults while exercising between 50 to 80% of the ventilatory (anaerobic) threshold. Cooper et al. (1985) compared oxygen uptake and heart rate kinetics in young children (average age 8.6 yrs) to older youth (17.4 yrs). The participants performed cycle ergometry at intensities equaling 75 % of the ventilatory threshold. Phase I O2 kinetics was expressed as a percentage of VO2 peak. Results indicated that the older youth worked at a higher percentage of max (63.5%) as compared to the children (42.5%). Phase II responses were similar between groups and Cooper et al. (1985) suggested that the kinetics of VO2 were independent of body size and age during growth when exercising at intensities below the ventilatory threshold. In two related studies, Armon et al., (1991) and Zanconato et al. (1991) compared the O2 kinetic response in children to adults. Armon et al. observed different t with the children adjusting more quickly to high intensity constant work test than the adults. The average O2 cost (ml O2 · min-1·W-1) was also greater in the children as compared to the adults. Zanconato et al. (1991) examined the O2 cost (integral of VO2 above baseline) during exercise (1 min bouts) and recovery in children and adults. The O2 cost was independent of work intensity and was higher in children only during exercise above the ventilatory (anaerobic) threshold. In more recent work, Fawkner et al. (2002) observed that children had a faster t response than adults. Moreover, no gender differences were evident in either the children or adults. Hebestreit et al., (1998) and Williams et al. (2001) found no differences in t when comparing boys to men when exercising at either 50% of VO2 peak (Hebestreit 1998) or 80% of VO2 at lactate threshold (Williams et al. 2001). However, during heavier work (50% of the diff between VO2 at lactate threshold and VO2 max) t was faster in the boys. Fawkner and Armstrong (2004) observed no statistical differences when using a mono-exponential model as compared to double-exponential model in finding t during moderate intensity constant load work tests in children. However, t occurred earlier for the boys when compared to the girls. The second component of the double-exponential model is typically identified as the slow component of VO2. Thus, the slow component of VO2 was not confounding the model determining . Typically, the slow component is observed in workloads above the lactate threshold (Fawkner and Armstrong, 2003; Gaesser and Poole, 1996). In earlier research, Sady, et al. (1983) found no child - adult differences in the ½ time response to steady-state. Some of the discrepancies in findings are probably due to different methods employed to observe initial responses to constant work tests. For example, Reybrouck et al. (2003) observed that increasing treadmill elevation (intensity) resulted in slower O2 kinetic responses. Moreover, Hebestreit et al. (1998) suggested eliminating phase I from the determination of t. In the only study that we have found that examined severely obese youth, Cooper et al. (1990) studied O2 uptake kinetics in youth (13.4 ± 2.3 yrs) who were greater than 160% of their ideal body mass. The values were compared to predicted normal weight standards. There was no significant difference between groups in relation to VO2 max (L·min-1) or T-vent (L·min-1). The t response in the obese youth (29 ± 9 sec) was similar to the normal weight controls (28 ± 6 sec), as was the VO2 max (L·min-1) and T-vent (L·min-1). As mentioned, in the current study no t differences were noted, however the values obtained (severely overweight 33.9 ± 22.7 sec, normal weight 41.5 ± 21 sec) were higher than the values of Cooper et al. (1990), but were within the expected range (Armon et al., 1991; Cooper et al., 1985; Fawkner et al., 2002; Hebesteit et al., 1998; Williams et al., 2001). Cooper et al (1990) also observed that the kinetic response of VCO2 and VE were prolonged in the obese group. Cooper et al. (1990) summarized that the subjects did not differ from the normal weight children on the basis of cardiorespiratory fitness (VO2 max L·min-1) and the de-conditioning in the severely overweight child due to excessive body mass is a fallacy. The results of the present study agree with Cooper et al. (1990) in which there were no significant differences between the absolute VO2 (L·min-1) values for VO2 peak or for T-vent (% of VO2 peak) between the severely overweight and normal weight subjects. As noted earlier, O2 kinetic responses were similar for the severely overweight and normal weight girls. On the other hand, the severely overweight group had significant larger O2 deficit values than the normal weight group. We speculate that the larger values found in the severely overweight group may have been due to a greater percentage of the energy derived from anaerobic sources (Medbo et al., 1988, Renoux et al., 1999). This is only speculation as anaerobic indicators such as lactate production were not measured in the current study. Also, since the constant workloads employed were 20% below T-vent, we suggest that the slow component of VO2 was not confounding the O2 deficit since the slow component typically occurs above the lactate threshold (Gaesser and Poole, 1996; Fawkner and Armstrong, 2003). As noted in Table 4, weak correlation’s (r’s ranging from - 0.15 to 0.26) were found between phase I, t with VO2 peak or fat weight. These results suggest that fitness or fatness level had limited effect on O2 kinetic responses. Cooper et al. (1985) found similar results for phase I kinetics (r = 0.36) with mass or stature. However, in young heart patients, Mocellin et al., (1999) reported an r of -0.59 between VO2 max and the ½ time to VO2 steady-state. Fawkner et al. (2002) found no significant correlations for children, although in adult males phase II kinetics were related to VO2 max expressed in L·min-1, r = -0.62, -0.81 ml·kg-1·min-1 and -0.82 ml·kg-1·min-1. On the other had, the O2 deficit was moderately related to fitness (r = 0.51) or fatness (r = 0.35). Consequently as the peak VO2 (L·min-1) or fat weight (kg) increased, the O2 deficit increased moderately. |