Long-term strength and power training improved the maximal anaerobic cycling power in all subjects in the training group, and the mean maximal jumping height in the training group. These changes were in line with a tendency of increased proportion of MHC IIa and a decreased proportion of MHC IIx isoforms. Similar adaptive responses of MHC IIx to regular exercise training have been shown in previous studies (e.g. , Campos et al., 2002; Sharman et al., 2001). Both endurance and strength and power types of physical activity decrease the proportion of the fastest human MHC isoform (Andersen et al., 1994; Carroll et al., 1998; Klitgaard et al., 1990; Staron et al., 1994; Tajsharghi et al., 2004). We found no studies in previous literature where exercise training would have caused an increase in the proportion of MHC IIx isoform. The proportion of MHC IIx isoform only increases after declined neuromuscular activity, such as detraining (Andersen and Aagaard, 2000), or during inactivity, such as immobilization (Talmadge et al., 2002) or long-term bed rest (Andersen et al., 1999; Hostler et al., 2001; Trappe et al., 2004). In the present study, the training lasted for 54 weeks and decreased the proportion of MHC IIx by 7.0 %-units. Similar decreases of MHC IIx have been reported in other studies with shorter exercise interventions (Campos et al., 2002; Putman et al., 2004; Sharman et al., 2001). In the study with young adults, only six weeks of exercise training (combined strength and endurance training) resulted in a significant decrease in MHC IIx content (Putman et al., 2004). The increase of MHC IIa and decrease of MHC IIx isoforms have been suggested to reflect a transition from the fast to the slower type of MHC; so also in the present study. A similar MHC transition has been found after heavy resistance training in young (Adams et al., 1993; Campos et al., 2002; Liu et al., 2003) and old subjects (Sharman et al., 2001). Alternative, bi-directional MHC transitions from MHC I and MHC IIx to MHC IIa have previously been demonstrated after sprint training (Andersen et al., 1994). In the present study, the mean percentage of MHC I remained the same during the training period, which was comparable with the results of previous studies with resistance or strength training interventions (Campos et al., 2002; Hostler et al., 2001). MHC profile analysis and histochemical fiber type analysis are not fully comparable. It has been shown that MHC profile responds faster to exercise stimulus than mATPase fiber profile does (Staron et al., 1994) and that, for example, part of histochemically assessed IIB fibers contain MHC IIa isoforms (Sant`ana Pereira et al., 1995). Thus, the MHC profile analyses are more sensitive measures to show changes in functional properties of muscle fibers as a result of exercise training than the mATPase fiber profile analyses do. In the present study, strength and power training lasting 54 weeks tended to increase the proportion of MLC1f in the vastus lateralis muscle in the training group. In addition, the negative correlation between the changes of MLC1f and MLC1s proportions (r = -0.79; p < 0.05) shows that these alterations were in the same direction in most of the subjects (6/8). Trappe and co-workers (2000, 2001) studied the effects of a 12-week resistance training intervention on MLC isoform proportions in subjects aged approximately 74 years and found no significant changes in single muscle fibers of m. vastus lateralis. Their exercise program, however, differed from our program: the exercises were performed with heavy loads (80% of 1 RM) and with slow speed which resulted in increased cell size, strength and contractile velocity in both slow- and fast MHC muscle fibers (‘more pronounced in MHC I fibers’) in men (Trappe et al., 2000) and only in MHC I muscle fibers in women (Trappe et al., 2001). In contrast, we used varying (30-85% of 1 RM) but mainly lower loads and high exercise tempo or high contractile velocity (power-type resistance training). Furthermore, the subjects in the study by Trappe et al., 2001 were older, and the training period was only a quarter of that in our study. Given that the duration of the training period in our study was much longer, that the subjects had rather high proportion of fast MHC muscle fibers in their vastus lateralis muscles, and that the training focused on the fast muscle fibers, the tentative changes in MLC isoforms can be assumed to be real. The small number of subjects and the fact that MHC and MLC fiber proportions were assessed using the muscle tissue homogenate instead of the single fiber method could be reasons for insufficient power of our study. Although the changes in the MLC isoforms during the long-term strength and power training were not statistically significant, they correlated with the changes in MHC profiles. The changes in MLC isoforms may possibly be associated with the transition of MHC isoforms as a result of the strength and power training and thus indicate improved muscle contraction. This, however, remains to be investigated in the future. In previous studies, the shortest exercise period shown to affect the MHC isoform profile (results from the triceps brachii muscle) has been six weeks of strength training with maximum contractions and training 3 times a week (+17. 3% in MHC IIa and -13.9% in MHC IIx isoforms) and with a combination of three types of training (once a week per type): strength training with maximum contractions, ballistic exercises, and stretch-shortening movements (+15% in MHC IIa and -9% in MHC I isoforms) (Liu et al., 2003). Training effects are perhaps detected earlier in the upper arm muscles than in the postural muscles, such as the vastus lateralis muscle. Recently, Kyröläinen and co-workers (2005) demonstrated that, during a 15-week power training period, drop jump increased in young, recreationally active men but there was no significant change in the MHC isoforms and muscle fiber proportions. This may be due to the high initial training status and the fact that the subjects continued their previous endurance-type sport activities (cycling, walking and ball games) for 6 hours a week on the average. In the present study, the strength and power training lasted for 54 weeks, but we only observed an increase of 6.8 %-units in MHC IIa and a decrease of 7.0 %-units in MHC IIx isoforms. In both studies, the subjects exercised 3 times a week, as targeted in our study. Strength training with maximum contraction causes a stronger stress for skeletal muscles, leading to muscle hypertrophy, than the varying exercises with varying relative loads carried out in our training program. The training focused more on developing the speed of muscle contraction than on increasing the maximal strength of muscles. It is also possible that the adaptive changes in skeletal muscle structure are not as extensive in middle-aged participants as in young participants, e.g., as a result from a smaller margin for MHC IIx to change due to lower baseline proportions (Short et al., 2005) and perhaps also a lower synthesis rate of MHC in the older people (Hasten et al., 2000). An additional reason for low training effects can be that that the power type strength training was not carried out equally successfully by all the subjects. This suggestion was supported by the correlation coefficient of r = 0.61 between the amount of earlier recreational sports activity and the reduction of MHC IIx isoform reflecting the idea that the experienced subjects were more skilled and could perform exercises more effectively. However, in the both studies jumping performance increased significantly, perhaps due to neural adaptations (Häkkinen et al., 1985; Häkkinen and Häkkinen, 1995; Moritani and De Vries, 1980), but changes in MHC profiles did not reach statistical significance. That might be interpreted so that the type and/or amount of training was not proper for subjects and training included to many varying elements influencing on MHC profiles with opposite manner. The present study raised a number of interesting questions that still remain open. In the future, studies should be designed with larger populations and with more homogeneous study groups. Furthermore, to get more reliable knowledge about training-induced adaptations in muscle tissue, to make correct interpretations, and to draw appropriate conclusions from the results, it is important to estimate the protein intake during the intervention. Similarly, it is critical to evaluate the effects of the current training status, the exercise background and the age of the study group on the variables studied already before fixing the study design. Otherwise, it is very difficult to confirm any changes reliably. In addition, it is essential to have knowledge of the extent of simultaneous physical activities of the subjects so as to ensure a positive nitrogen balance and sufficient recovery time for the muscles to develop their structures and energy capacity during the intervention period. The control group was small and heterogeneous for age, maximal anaerobic cycling power, and proportion of MHC IIx. Unfortunately, only few of the control subjects were willing to give samples of their muscle tissue. These matters and the size difference between the training and control groups reduce the reliability of comparisons between the groups to some extent. |