The present study was designed to investigate the effects of acute normobaric hypoxia on peripheral muscle deoxygenation during the supramaximal exercise in trained track sprinters and healthy untrained non-athletes. As expected, the condition of acute hypoxia caused greater muscle deoxygenation in vastus lateralis muscle during performance of a 30 s Wingate test when compared with performance of the test under the condition of normoxia, without impairing the anaerobic performance in either group. Additionally, the athletic group, which had higher VO2max and peak power output, showed a greater degree of muscle deoxygenation during the 30 s Wingate test than the untrained group under hypoxic conditions (Figure 2). Previously, very few studies have examined the effect of acute hypoxia on the trends in peripheral muscle oxygenation during supramaximal exercise. To the best of our knowledge, Ito et al., 2001 alone have investigated the effects of acute hypoxia (FIO2 = 0.144) on peakVO2, peakVE, and the vastus lateralis muscle oxygenation measured by NIRcws during and following a 30 s Wingate test in triathletes. As a result, they have reported that there were larger decrement in peakVO2, increment in peakVE, and slower recovery rate of muscle oxygenation following a 30 s Wingate test under hypoxia compared with that under normoxia, whereas hypoxia did not impair the performance of the test. Although their result is different from ours in the period which was observed at experiments, both studies exhibit similarities in the obvious difference between hypoxia and normoxia conditions in muscle oxygenation trends. Concerning the effects of hypoxia on the degree of muscle deoxygenation during exercise, some researchers have examined them during other exercises using NIRcws. Costes et al., 1996 have reported that the vastus lateralis muscle oxygenation was 99.3% at rest and decreased slightly to 94.9% during a 30 min steady-state cycling exercise under normoxia, whereas, under hypoxia, muscle oxygenation at rest (91.7%) was significantly lower than under normoxia and decreased dramatically to 82.7% during the exercise. In addition, several studies have shown that acute hypoxia has caused a greater degree of vastus lateralis muscle deoxygenation during constant-load (Richardson et al., 1995), incremental maximal exercise (Subudhi et al., 2007), and parallel squat exercises (Oguri et al., 2004) compared with normoxia. It follows from the present study and previous reports that acute hypoxia would enhance the degree of peripheral muscle deoxygenation during supramaximal exercise compared with normoxia. Tissue oxygenation, defined as the relative saturation of OxyHb, depends on the balance between oxygen delivery, as reflected by the product of blood flow and arterial oxygen content, and oxygen extraction (Subudhi et al., 2007). As one possible explanation for greater muscle deoxygenation under hypoxia, the reduced arterial oxygen content plus metabolic demand has been reported to decrease the overall muscle oxygen content during exercise under hypoxia, whereas only venous blood is deoxygenated by metabolic demand during exercise under normoxia (Costes et al., 1996). A pulmonary diffusion limitation due to reduced oxygen partial pressure under hypoxia induces arterial oxygen desaturation, finally reducing arterial oxygen content and oxygen availability for the muscles (Dempsey et al., 1982; Raynaud et al., 1986). In the present study, we found that a larger difference in muscle deoxygenation between performance under hypoxic and normoxic conditions was accompanied by lowest SpO2 in the 30 s Wingate test under hypoxia (Figure 5). These findings suggest that arterial oxygen desaturation caused by pulmonary diffusion limitation would be the dominant factor to explain a pronounced muscle deoxygenation during supramaximal exercise under hypoxic conditions. As another likely explanation for tissue deoxygenation, it is suggested that oxygen extraction could play an important role during exercise under hypoxia. Jensen-Urstad et al., 1995 have reported that not only arterial oxygen saturation but also arteriovenous oxygen difference were lower during exercises under hypoxia than under normoxia. Arteriovenous oxygen difference, as reflected in oxygen extraction, may partly explain a more pronounced muscle deoxygenation under hypoxia. In addition, the above decreased oxygen availability during a hypoxic 30 s Wingate test is consistent with the decrement in peakVO2 and increment in peakVE, which is supported by the findings of McLellan et al., 1990 and Ito et al., 2001. There are no reports, as far as we know, to compare the effects of hypoxia on muscle oxygenation trends during supramaximal exercise between athletes and untrained subjects. In athletes, a greater degree of peripheral muscle deoxygenation seems to be caused during hypoxic supramaximal exercise in comparison with sedentary people (Figure 2). Bae et al., 1997 reported that sprinters and non-athletes elicited 95% and 82% of cuff ischaemia deoxygenation respectively during a 30 s Wingate test, and they attributed the greater muscle deoxygenation during the exercise in athletes to their training status. On the other hand, there are several reports to support that higher physical fitness causes the dramatic changes of cardiorespiratory responses during various exercises under hypoxia. Martin and O'Kroy, 1993 and Mollard et al., 2007 have shown that highly trained subjects had a greater decrement in VO2max, maximal heart rate, and ventilation under hypoxia compared with untrained subjects. In trained subjects, a greater oxygen diffusion limitation in the pulmonary capillaries could account for a greater arterial oxygen desaturation than in sedentary subjects (Dempsey et al., 1982). As a consequence of larger arterial desaturation, arterial oxygen content and oxygen availability for the muscles decrease (Mollard et al., 2007). In the present study, we have found that the athletic group had significantly lower SpO2 (Figure 3) and larger decrement in muscle oxygenation (Figure 2) during the 30 s Wingate test compared with the untrained group under hypoxia. Our findings are consistent with earlier results, suggesting that pronounced muscle deoxygenation during supramaximal exercise under hypoxia in athletes would be explained mainly by the greater arterial oxygen desaturation. In addition, the high level of tissue oxygen extraction in trained subjects might play an important role in the decrease in oxygen availability for the muscles under acute hypoxia. Tissue oxygen extraction under normoxia is much greater in trained subjects than in untrained subjects. The higher power output during the 30 s Wingate test suggests that the athletic group had a greater tissue oxygen extraction than the untrained group. Because trained athletes would approach, even under normoxia, the physiological upper limit of tissue oxygen extraction, they could no more increase tissue oxygen extraction to compensate for the arterial oxygen desaturation under hypoxia (Mollard et al., 2007). Although we had not measured the arterial oxygen content and tissue oxygen extraction to explain the greater muscle deoxygenation in athletes, this statement is supported by a larger peakVO2 decrement and peakVE increment under hypoxic conditions in the athletic group. A limitation of the current study was that cardiovascular parameters such as heart rate, blood flow, stroke volume, and cardiac output during 30 s Wingate tests were not measured, thereby, making it difficult to discuss rigorously the factors underlying the greater degree of muscle deoxygenation under hypoxia. Furthermore, we expected that blood lactate would increase more during hypoxia following the 30 s Wingate test compared with that under normoxia owing to the enhancement of the anaerobic energy released (Jensen-Urstad et al., 1995). However, blood lactate concentration during the 30 s Wingate test was not altered by hypoxia in any group. McLellan et al., 1990 have reported that despite the higher muscle lactate values that were observed following the hypoxic Wingate test, blood lactate levels were reduced compared with the normoxic test. And they suggest that a decrease in the post-exercise hyperaemia following the hypoxic Wingate test could explain the higher muscle but lower blood lactate concentrations. It may be difficult to determine the effect of hypoxia on lactate kinetics during and following supramaximal exercise using capillary blood samples. The thickness of subcutaneous fat and skin is the main factor influencing the sensitivity and accuracy of NIRcws (Quaresima et al., 2003). In the present study, because the athletic and untrained groups had a similar thickness of femoral subcutaneous fat and skin (¼ 4.0 mm) on their vastus lateralis muscle (Table 1), a higher sensitivity and lower error would be worked out (Wang et al., 2001). |