The incidence of CECS in the general population is unclear, however, in one study of patients with undiagnosed lower leg pain (Qvarfordt et al., 1983), the incidence was 14%. On the other hand, in a study of patients with chronic exercise-induced anterior lower leg pain the incidence was 27% (Styf, 1988). Initial CECS symptomatology is not clear and increases gradually (García-Mata et al., 2001). The hallmark diagnostic tool to confirm CECS has been reported to be intracompartmental pressure testing. Objective criteria for diagnosis of chronic exertional compartment syndrome of the leg were defined by Pedowitz et al. after review of 131 pressure studies in patients with chronic exertional leg pain (Pedowitz et al., 1990). In this study, all participants , men athletes and controls, women athletes and controls, were asymptomatic. The use of the wick catheter technique revealed normal intracompartmental values in the anterior tibial compartment prior to exercise. All subjects were presenting the lowest intracompartment pressure value one minute before exercise initiation while the highest value was recorded at the first minute during exercise. This finding is in accordance with those of a previous study (McDermott et al., 1982), supporting that exercise-induced changes in the intracompartment pressure occur rapidly at the start of exercise, while Logan et al. (1983) study advocates that both average and peak to peak pressures measured during exercise are elevated compared to those recorded at rest, and that intracompartmental pressures raise with increasing speed. Despite increase of intracompartmental pressure values during and post exercise, no participant reported any symptoms that either affected or ceased exercise. At the first minute of exercise six participants, one male athlete, three male controls, and two female controls presented pathological values without reporting any symptoms. This finding comes into agreement with Padhiar and King, 1996 results who reported that CECS arises as a result of a series of events , characterized by an increase of the muscle volume caused by the increased exercise- related blood flow. As a matter of fact and although raised intracomparmental pressure values are usually used in the diagnostic procedure, it seems that they are not the sole cause of CECS symptoms (Barnes, 1997). Indeed, as referred in a study of a consecutive operative series of 100 patients (Detmer et al., 1985) there is no definite correlation between the intramuscular pressure and the severity of symptomatology or the rate of recurrence. In addition, Hargens and Mubarak, 1998 claim that after the exercise completion symptoms usually subside, but they typically reappear either at the same interval and intensity or even sooner with worst symptoms at the next athletic session (Potteiger et al., 2002). This finding requires physicians and physiotherapists attention as pathological intracompartmental values in asymptomatic athletes may be overlooked and thus, result in irreversible damage of the tissues leading to surgical treatment (Brennan and Kane, 2003; Fronek et al., 1987; Howard et al., 2000). As it has been suggested (Barnes, 1997), increased intracompartmental pressure values are related to a less extensible fascia preventing the normal increases in muscle size during exercise leading so to a raised intramuscular pressure. Referring to the subgroups, one minute before exercise, control men group presented lower intracompartmental pressure than athlete men and women groups, as well as athlete women group recorded higher intra-compartment pressure than control women group,providing a correlation between long distance runners and the increased risk of chronic exertional compartment syndrome (CECS) development.This observation is in accordance with Kostopoulos et al. (2004) where non-athletes presented lower intracompartmental pressures at rest, compared with basketball athletes. As more women have become involved in competitive athletics, it appears that the incidence of CECS in men and women is similar (Qvarfordt et al., 1983, Pedowitz et al., 1990). However, in this study it has to be noted that no woman athlete revealed intracompartmental pressure values above the normal limits before exersice. Because CECS is produced by exercise, it is most useful to examine the compartment during and after vigorous exertion of the muscles in the anterior tibial compartment. Comparing further the men and women subgroups, at the first minute during the exercise, control men group showed higher intra-compartment pressure than control women group, while athlete men group showed higher intra-compartment pressure than athlete women group. The finding could be indicative of a sex difference both for athletes and controls, possibly explained by the limitation of circulation in the smaller female unyielding compartment, which especially in women athletes susceptible to CECS canno accommodate the associated 20% increase in muscle mass that typically occurs with intense exercise. (Schissel and Godwin, 1999). CECS of the lower extremity is often misdiagnosed, requiring repeated visits to the physician and subsequent delay in definitive treatment. Early suspicion of the condition is paramount, because the definitive treatment is fasciotomy. Family physicians and general medical officers caring for otherwise healthy people and athletes should be aware of the syndrome so that prompt orthopaedic referral for evaluation and definitive treatment will not be delayed. |