Research article - (2022)21, 82 - 90 DOI: https://doi.org/10.52082/jssm.2022.82 |
Physiological and Performance Correlates of Squash Physical Performance |
Carl James1,, Timothy Jones1, Saro Farra2 |
Key words: Squash, fitness testing, aerobic fitness, sport-specific, squash training |
Key Points |
|
|
|
Experimental design |
Data were derived from quarterly fitness testing at the National Squash Centre of Malaysia. Testing occurred on multiple occasions over 18-months, always commencing on a Monday morning, following 36-48 hours rest and under consistent environmental conditions (25.7 ± 1.9 °C, 56 ± 5.8 % relative humidity). Players completed individual warm-ups, which were replicated for all testing sessions. Warm-ups included jogging, lateral movements, accelerations and mobility exercises. Players then completed the SPPT, followed by a 5-10 min low intensity warm-down and individual stretching. Players rested on Monday afternoon and returned the following morning for further assessments. On the second day, players warmed-up and completed the following assessments in a fixed order; (i) 5 m sprint, (ii) COD and (iii) RSA. Body composition and jump tests were conducted within 7 days of these tests, following 24 hours rest. Body composition was measured during a morning, prior to any training. All players were familiarised with testing protocols, having completed all tests on at least two prior occasions. Approximately three months after completing the testing battery, a subset of players completed a second SPPT using a portable metabolic cart, to assess cardiorespiratory responses. For all analyses, the SPPT score was used as a measure of squash physical performance. |
Participants |
Thirty-one professional Malaysian squash players volunteered for this study. The cohort comprised 21 males (age 20 ± 4 years, body mass 65.0 ± 6.0 kg, stature 172.8 ± 6.4 cm, sum of 7 skinfolds 53.1 ± 16.5 mm, WR 42-594) and 10 females (age 18 ± 5 years, body mass 55.7 ± 5.0 kg, stature 1.60 ± 0.04 m, sum of 7 skinfolds; 94.7 ± 22.2 mm, world ranking 7-182). This cohort encompassed all national players based full-time at the squash centre of Malaysia and enabled a large effect size (when greater than ≥0.53) to be identified between higher and lower performance groups for SPPT performance. This sample size will detect a difference at p < 0.05, with a power of 80%. The power calculation was carried out using All players typically completed ten training sessions per week (~12 hours), had resided at the national high-performance centre of Malaysia for at least 1 year and regularly competed in international Professional Squash Association (PSA) events. A typical training week comprised three ‘group’ on-court training sessions, one/two match-play sessions, one/two individual coaching ‘feeding’ sessions, two strength sessions and two/three conditioning sessions (James, et al., |
Player ranking and performance level assignment |
To investigate differences between higher and lower performing players on the SPPT, two national coaches independently assigned all players a numerical rank, with males (n = 21) and females (n = 10) ranked separately. Mean ‘coach’ ranking was used to order players, and where this did not differentiate players (n = 4 instances), the most recent match result determined the relative position. A coach ranking approach was utilized as four players did not have a current WR, and this helped mitigate any legacy effects of the rolling average calculation of a player’s current world ranking, which may not be reflective of a player’s physical status at a given time. For example, if injury had previously enforced a break from tournament participation. Of players who had a current WR (obtained from the PSA website), there was strong agreement between WR at the time of fitness assessments and the ‘coach’ ranking for both males (rs = 0.998, p = 0.001, n = 18) and females (rs = 0.800, p = 0.005, n = 9). Players were assigned to performance levels (HIGH or LOW) based on their coach ranking, with the top half of males and females assigned to HIGH and the bottom half assigned to LOW. |
Procedures Squash physical performance test |
A schematic of the SPPT, as well as data concerning the reliability and validity of physiological measurements, can be found in James et al. ( |
Metabolic measurements |
When cardiorespiratory measures were recorded during the second SPPT, players wore a portable metabolic cart (Cosmed K5, Rome, Italy). Before every test, the metabolic cart was calibrated in accordance with manufacturer’s instructions. The mean submaximal oxygen consumption (mL·kg-1·km-1) during the final minute of first four stages of the test were averaged as a measure of movement economy (James et al., |
5m sprint test |
Players completed three 5m sprints on a squash court, each separated by 3-min rest. Each sprint started from a standing position, 1m behind the designated starting line. Sprint duration was measured using electronic timing gates (Smartspeed, Fusion Sport, Brisbane, Australia), with the fastest time used for analysis. |
Change-of-direction speed test |
Following a 5-min rest, players completed a squash-specific COD test. A test schematic, as well as the reporting of both validity and reliability (0.13 s / 1.2%) are described by Wilkinson et al. ( |
Repeated-sprint ability test |
Following a further 5-min rest, players completed a squash-specific RSA test (Willkinson et al., |
Anthropometric profiling |
Eleven measurements were taken from each player. These included stature (m), body mass (kg), sum of seven skinfolds (mm) and two girth measurements. The seven skinfolds were biceps, triceps, sub-scapular, suprailiac, mid-thigh, proximal calf and medial calf. All skinfolds were taken using Harpendon calipers (British Indicators Ltd., UK) by the same, trained practitioner (ISAK level 2). Mid-thigh and maximum calf girths were measured using a tape measure (Lufkin W606PD, USA). |
Squat jumps and countermovement jumps |
Squat jump (SJ) and countermovement jump (CMJ) assessments were conducted using a contact mat (SmartJump, Fusion Sport), following a warm-up. This contained mobility exercises, light jogging and progressively more forceful submaximal jumping and hopping. Players completed three trials of both jumps, with 1-min rest between. Ten minutes rest was allowed between SJ and CMJ. The highest jump was recorded as the score. Jump height was estimated from flight time using the formula: Jump Height = 9.81 * (flight time)2 / 8. For both jumps, players were required to maintain their hands on their hips, feet shoulder-width apart, to straighten legs in mid-air, and to land with soft knees. For SJ, players assumed a semi-squat position at 90° of knee flexion and held this position for two seconds before jumping without any pre-stretch movement. CMJs were completed with a counter movement immediately preceding take-off. Jumps were completed by 13 players; six players were unable to participate due to other training requirements. Depth was not controlled for CMJs, however all players were familiarised with this protocol, having completed it on multiple previous occasions. |
Statistical analyses |
World ranking data are reported as median (interquartile range). Remaining data are reported as mean (±SD) and were analysed using SPSS software (V25, SPSS Inc, Chicago, USA). Differences were considered significant when p < 0.05. Data were checked for normality of distribution and homogeneity of variance, using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Levene’s tests, respectively. Physiological and performance data were analysed using two-way ANOVA, to explore the effect of Performance Level (HIGH / LOW) and Sex (male / female) on SPPT final lap and the lap associated with 4 mM.L-1. Significant findings were followed up with pairwise comparisons, using a Bonferroni correction. Cohen’s d effect sizes are presented. Pearson’s Product Moment Correlation coefficient (r) was calculated separately for males and females between outcome variables and the SPPT scores. Correlational analysis was also performed on the pooled data to increase the generalisability of our findings across a range of squash performance levels. Where a player did not undertake all assessments, existing data was retained for analysis, with total samples displayed in |
|
|
The HIGH and LOW performance levels for males, displayed a WR range of 42-278 (mean 146, median 121, interquartile range 64-229) and 310-594 (mean 435, median 385, interquartile range 361-526), respectively. For females, the HIGH WR range was 7-101 (mean 63, median 64, interquartile range 47-93) and 103-182 (mean 132, median 110, interquartile range 107-146) for LOW. |
SPPT Performance |
There were statistically significant main effects of Performance Level (F = 4.331, p = 0.047, d = 0.35) and Sex (F = 23.004, p < 0.001, d = 1.82) on SPPT final lap performance. Participants in HIGH outperformed LOW (79.2 ± 10.0 vs 74.9 ± 14.7 laps), while males completed more laps than females (82.6 ± 9.4 vs 65.6 ± 10.4 laps). There were statistically significant main effects of Performance Level (F = 4.707, p = 0.04, d = 0.52) and Sex (F = 18.644, p < 0.001, d = 1.67) on 4 mM·L-1 lap performance. Participants in HIGH completed more laps before achieving a blood lactate of 4 mM·L-1 compared to LOW (61.8 ± 10.3 vs 56.5 ± 10.5 laps), while males outperformed females (64.1 ± 7.7 vs 50.5 ± 9.7 laps). Descriptive statistics for all variables, are shown in |
Performance and physiological determinants |
Correlations between physiological and performance attributes and SPPT performance are shown in SPPT final lap (77 ± 9 laps) was significantly correlated with V̇O2max (47.7 ± 5.3 mL·kg-1·min-1, r =0.686, p = 0.005, n = 15), and 4 mM·L-1 (62 ± 5 laps, r = 0.837, p = 0.001, n = 15), but not average movement economy across the first four stages (263.6 ± 5.3 mL·kg-1·km-1, r = 0.019, p = 0.946, n = 15). There was a large correlation between 4 mM·L-1 and V̇O2max (r = 0.579, p = 0.024, n = 15), but not with average movement economy (r = 0.009, p = 0.975, n = 15). Based upon these data, a diagram of training priorities for Squash players is presented in |
|
|
This study investigated whether the SPPT could differentiate between higher and lower ranked players, as well as the physiological and performance correlates of SPPT performance. The SPPT demonstrates construct validity, as it discriminated between HIGH and LOW ranked players across final lap (d = 0.35) and 4 mM.L-1 lap (d = 0.52). These results highlight the importance of using sport-specific aerobic performance measures to profile elite male and female squash players, across junior and senior levels. Secondly, we investigated physiological and performance determinants of SPPT final lap and found large - very-large correlations (r = 0.68-0.86) with 4 mM.L-1 lap, RSA, COD, body composition and V̇O2max. |
SPPT performance |
This investigation corroborates previous research illustrating that higher ranked players outperform their lower ranked counterparts when squash-specific aerobic fitness assessments are used (Steininger and Wodick, Although this investigation reinforces the importance of aerobic conditioning within squash, the novel finding of this study is that higher ranked players possess greater submaximal aerobic fitness qualities than lower ranked players, when assessed on a squash-specific test. As match intensities commonly exceeds the second ventilatory threshold (Girard et al., |
Performance Determinants |
Our investigation revealed that SPPT final lap was significantly correlated with 4 mM.L-1, RSA, and COD for both male and female players, while 4 mM.L-1 was related to RSA for males only. The lack of a significant relationship between 4 mM.L-1 and RSA (p = 0.06) in our female cohort may reflect the small sample size (n = 9). Interestingly, COD was correlated with SPPT final lap but not the 4 mM.L-1 lap, despite the latter two variables being measured while players negotiated the same course. This likely reflects the maximal nature of the COD test and suggests that the neuromuscular requirements of the SPPT differ while running at maximal and submaximal intensities. Based on this data, we speculate that metabolic pathways, rather than neuromuscular properties, may be the dominant factor in determining 4 mM.L-1 lap performance. However, further research is required to confirm this proposition. We found RSA to be correlated with SPPT final lap and 4 mM.L-1 lap for both males and females. This supports previous research that has advocated the importance of RSA qualities within elite squash (Wilkinson et al., |
Physiological determinants |
We also investigated the physiological determinants of the SPPT final lap, using a subset of players from the original cohort (n = 15). Correlations were made between SPPT performance and V̇O2max, movement economy, and 4 mM.L-1 lap, which provided a proxy for the lactate turn-point. The very-large relationship identified between 4 mM.L-1 lap and SPPT final lap (r = 0.83) reinforces the conclusions from the first SPPT, regarding the role of cardiovascular fitness, when assessed in a sport-specific manner. The submaximal nature of monitoring the metabolic transition denoted by the 4 mM.L-1 lap, either alone or in conjunction with the 2 mM.L-1 lap (James et al., V̇O2max demonstrated a large positive correlation (r = 0.62) with SPPT final lap. Although the SPPT yields valid V̇O2max values when conducting the test with a metabolic cart (James et al., We observed a non-significant relationship between SPPT and movement economy (r = 0.019), measured as the average submaximal oxygen consumption across the first four stages of the test. Whilst customary for assessing movement economy (Jones, |
Limitations |
The practical challenges associated with recruiting elite, international standard squash players limited the sample size of this study, especially within our female cohort. Whilst a sample size calculation indicates suitable power to detect an effect within changes in SPPT final lap at the whole group level, some caution should be taken when interpreting the findings pertaining to female players. Future research should investigate how aerobic fitness parameters differ between elite male and female players. Our testing battery included assessments with standardized footwork patterns. Thus, we have not examined ‘agility’ as players require during matches. However, integrating lights or reactive cues within a fitness assessment may influence the outcome of the SPPT, RSA or COD, challenging the accurate interpretation of each physical quality. Moreover, during matches, players use a variety of situational cues to inform movement choice, which may be unrelated to generic visual or audible cues during a fitness assessment (Micklewright and Papapdopoulou, |
Practical Applications |
The SPPT provides amateur and elite squash players a single assessment of squash-specific physical performance that differentiates between performance levels. Individual performance profiling should prioritise assessments of cardiovascular fitness (i.e. 4 mM.L-1), RSA, COD and body composition ( Tracking the 4 mM.L-1 lap through regular, sub-maximal assessments, may offer a convenient athlete monitoring approach, negating a larger testing battery. A monthly assessment, at the start of a training week, minimizes training interruption (i.e. assessment represents a prolonged warm-up) and reduces the risk of injury and/or muscle soreness interruptions to training that may arise from maximal exercise testing (Horsley et al., We observed stronger correlations between SPPT and RSA (r = -0.79), than for RSA Fatigue Index (r = -0.39), alluding to the importance of prioritizing absolute RSA performance time, rather than the decrement (Girard et al., |
|
|
The SPPT offers a standalone assessment of squash physical performance, which can be enhanced with the collection of physiological data for individualized training prescription. Combining the SPPT with squash-specific assessments of RSA and COD enables physical performance profiles to be developed and by identifying individual strengths and weaknesses against normative data for these key assessments, training can be targeted to the most relevant training adaptations. |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
The authors would like to thanks the coaches and players at the Squash Racquets Association of Malaysia (SRAM) for enabling this research to be conducted. The experiments comply with the current laws of the country in which they were performed. The authors have no conflict of interest to declare. The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available, but are available from the corresponding author who was an organizer of the study. |
AUTHOR BIOGRAPHY |
|
REFERENCES |
|