This was an unusual case related to a volleyball injury. Particular injuries are seen in young volleyball players. Compared with other sports (handball, soccer, basketball, and badminton), volleyball players have a higher frequency of injuries to the hands, fingers, and ankles, but fewer injuries located in other anatomical regions (Solgard et al., 1995). It is highly significant that school/educational players have more hand and finger injuries than do club players (Solgard et al., 1995). Our case was a school volleyball player. As most of the injuries are the result of acute trauma, repeated long-term injuries are seen rarely. The hand and finger injuries occur during contact with the ball in the overhand pass position, and only a few occur while blocking or spiking. High-level club players incur noncontact injuries during jumping, and young players are generally injured by contact with the ball, mostly during overhand passing. In this case, the little-finger physeal injuries were thought to have occurred as a result of repeated trauma by contact with the ball during overhand passing, resulting in a Salter- Harris type V injury on the anteroposterior planes and a Salter Harris type II injury on the lateral planes. Thus, a flexion and valgus deformity occurred in the little-finger DIP joints. We had to exclude the possibility that this was a result of direct trauma to the upper extremities, which may cause vascular injuries leading to ischemia of the hand and fingers such as hypothenar hammer syndrome (Reekers and Koedam, 1998; Marie et al., 2007). In this case, the pathology was bilateral, and the patient examination did not support hypothenar hammer syndrome. Angiography must be performed to exclude microemboli in the digital arteries of the hand. This fracture pattern also mimics Saymours’ fracture, but it is caused by direct trauma to the distal phalanges physis, resulting in an open fracture. There is usually a transverse laceration of the nail matrix, with the base of the nail itself extruding out from under the nail fold (Seymour, 1966). Premature closure of the epiphysis secondary to infection rather than direct injury to the growth plate was excluded (Engber and Clancy, 1978). We observed no infection or signs of premature epiphyseal closure in this case. |