Table 3. Mean (SD) of the time variables during the eccentric (tECC) and the concentric (tCON) contact phases, in Pre, Post 1 and Post 2. The statistics of the univariate repeated measures ANOVAs and the concomitant pairwise comparisons are also noted.
Variables Mean (SD) ANOVA Pairwise Comparisons
Cohen’s d effect size
(% of difference)
Pre Post 1 Post 2 F p value η2 Pre vs
Post 1
Pre vs
Post 2
Post 1 vs
Post 2
tCONTACT (ms) 823
(112)
841
(169)
819
(148)
.33 .66 .01 .13
(+2.3)
.03
(-.4)
.14
(-2.6)
tECC (ms) 543
(89)
562
(133)
537
(108)
.64 .49 .02 .17
(+3.4)
.05
(-1.2)
.21
(-4.4)
tCON (ms) 280
(34)
279
(44)
282
(49)
.10 .86 .00 .03
(-.05)
.05
(+1.0)
.07
(+1.1)
tFzECC (ms) 182
(63)
162
(55)
153
(37)
4.25 .03* .14 .34
(-11.2)
.50*
(-16.3)
.20
(-5.7)
tFzCON (ms) 581
(115)
667
(186)
622
(163)
4.57 .02* .15 .57*
(+14.7)
.27
(7.1)
.26
(-6.6)
tFxECC (ms) 470
(114)
462
(157)
405
(130)
2.52 .09 .09 .06
(-1.6)
.48
(-13.7)
.40
(-12.3)
tFxCON (ms) 756
(116)
775
(170)
753
(149)
.33 .66 .03 .13
(+2.5)
.02
(-.4)
.14
(-2.8)
tVECC (ms)†  365
(73)
346
(97)
333
(65)
2.11 .13 .08 .23
(-5.2)
.38
(-8.7)
.16
(-3.7)
tVCON (ms)†  793
(111)
809
(167)
786
(146)
.33 .66 .01 .11
(2.0)
.05
(-.9)
.15
(-2.8)
tPECC1st (ms) 253
(70)
228
(77)
221
(49)
2.60 .08 .09 .35
(-9.6)
.44
(-12.4)
.11
(-3.1)
tPECC2nd (ms) 475
(86)
474
(120)
464
(108)
.14 .87 .01 .01
(-.1)
.11
(-2.2)
.09
(-2.1)
tPCON (ms) 738
(115)
756
(170)
734
(150)
.31 .67 .01 .13
(+2.4)
.03
(-.5)
.14
(-2.8)
*Significance of ANOVA and pairwise comparisons at p ≤ 0.05.
†  V = Velocity,
‡ P = Power
1st and 2nd: the 1st and 2nd, respectively, peaks of the Power – time curve during the eccentric contact phase.