Table 3. Effect of the physical education-based stretching intervention program on the proportion of children with normal hamstring extensibility. Data are reported as frequency (% total).
Experimental group 1 Experimental group 2 Control group
Post-development Post-development Post-development
Low Normal Total Low Normal Total Low Normal Total
Pre-intervention Low 7 (15.9) 8 (18.2) 15 (34.1) 4 (7.8) 11 (21.6) 15 (29.4) 14 (31.1) 4 (8.9) 18 (40.0)
Normal 1 (2.3) 28 (63.6) 29 (65.9) 2 (3.9) 34 (66.7) 36 (70.6) 6 (13.3) 21 (46.7) 27 (60.0)
Total 8 (18.2) 36 (81.8) 44 (100.0) 6 (11.8) 45 (88.2) 51 (100.0) 20 (44.4) 25 (55.6) 45 (100.0)
pa .039 .022 .754
Post-maintenance Post-maintenance Post-maintenance
Low Normal Total Low Normal Total Low Normal Total
Post -development Low 4 (9.1) 4 (9.1) 8 (18.2) 2 (3.9) 4 (7.8) 6 (11.8) 17 (37.8) 3 (6.7) 20 (44.4)
Normal 2 (4.5) 34 (77.3) 36 (81.8) 7 (13.7) 38 (74.5) 45 (88.2) 2 (4.4) 23 (51.1) 25 (55.6)
Total 6 (13.6) 38 (86.4) 44 (100.0) 9 (17.6) 42 (82.4) 51 (100.0) 19 (42.2) 26 (57.8) 45 (100.0)
pa .687 .549 1.000
a Significance level from the McNemar’s test.