Table 2. Discriminative validity for the assessment of judo-specific performances between male elite and sub-elite judo athletes.
All (n = 27) Elite (n = 16) Sub-elite (n =11) p-value (d) AUC
Kuzushi without tsukuri
WPA (Nm)
nWPA (Nm/kg)
188.9 ± 69.5
2.3 ± 0.7
238.2 ± 46.4
2.6 ± 0.4
130.7 ± 40.5
1.8 ± 0.5
.001 (1.80) .90
WLA (Nm)
nWLA (Nm/kg)
136.5 ± 48.9
1.6 ± 0.5
165.6 ± 31.7
1.8 ± 0.4
102.1 ± 43.6
1.4± 0.5

.013 (1.09)

.77
FpeakPA (N)
nFpeakPA (N/kg)
402.5 ± 126.2
4.8 ± 1.3
453.2 ± 122.1
5.2 ± 1.4
342.7 ± 107.0
4.5 ±1.3
.198 (.52) .66
FpeakLA (N)
nFpeakLA (N/kg)
283.3 ± 69.6
3.4 ± 0.8
298.4 ± 68.6
3.2 ± 0.7
265.5 ± 69.7
3.6 ± 0.9
.181 (.50) .27
PPA (W)
nPPA (W/kg)
314.2 ± 105.3
3.6 ± 1.0
420.9 ± 49.1
3.9 ± 1.0
245.5 ± 72.7
3.1 ± 0.8
.050 (.88) .71
PLA (W)
nPLA (W/kg)
163.9 ± 97.9
2.4 ± 0.7
246.0 ± 66.3
2.7 ± 0.6
138.1 ± 82.3
2.1 ± 0.7
.041 (.93) .71
Kuzushi with tsukuri
WPA (Nm)
nWPA (Nm/kg)
134.9 ± 53.5
(1.6 ± 0.6)
164.5 ± 50.0
(1.8 ± 0.7)
99.9 ± 33.1
(1.4 ± 0.5)
.129 (.65) .67
WLA (Nm)
nWLA (Nm/kg)
107.7 ± 46.0
(1.4 ± 0.6)
128.7 ± 42.6
(1.6 ± 0.6)
82.9 ± 37.8
(1.1 ± 0.5)
.065 (.90) .73
FpeakPA (N)
nFpeakPA (N/kg)
368.3 ± 136.1
(4.5 ± 1.7)
423.7 ± 146.6
(4.7 ± 2.0)
302.8 ± 90.2
(4.3 ± 1.2)
.598 (.24) .53
FpeakLA (N)
nFpeakLA (N/kg)
236.5 ± 90.2
(2.9 ± 1.3)
261.4 ± 74.0
(3.2 ± 1.6)
207.1 ± 102.0
(2.6 ± 0.9)
.447 (.45) .59
PPA (W)
nPPA (W/kg)
141.8 ± 62.2
(1.7 ± 0.8)
177.3 ± 48.5
(1.7 ± 0.9)
140.9 ± 62.6
(1.8 ± 0.7)
.743 (.12) .45
PLA (W)
nPLA (W/kg)
134.3 ± 71.3
(1.6 ± 0.8)
193.4 ± 72.3
(1.8 ± 0.8)
95.8 ± 50.4
(1.2 ± 0.6)
.086 (.84) .71
Absolute and body mass normalized data was shown as mean ± standard deviation (mean ± SD). Differences between elite and sub-elite athletes were calculated using body mass normalized data for the first assessment. d = effect size, AUC = area under the receiver operating characteristics curve, W = mechanical work, Fpeak = maximal force, P = power, PA = pulling arm, LA = lifting arm, n = Body mass normalized data.