Table 2. HLRs of physical literacy as predictors towards coaching efficacy and leadership behaviour perceived by student-athletes. Predicting Variables Coaching Efficacy Leadership Behaviour ME GSE TE CBE TIB DB PFB AB SSB Gender –0.09 –0.08 –0.07 –0.07 –0.05 –.05 –.06 –0.21 –0.06 Age 0.01 0.06 0.03 0.08 –.13* –.15** –.08 –.29 –0.10# Training experience –0.02 –0.06 0.00 –0.02 .01 .05 .01 .13 .08 R2 0.03 0.04 0.02 0.03 .02 .03 .02 .12 .02 F 3.30 3.98 2.67 3.39 2.75 2.82 1.90 15.33 2.03 K & U .22** .18** .19** .23** .27** .22** .15* –.09 .15* SE & C .07 .10 .07 .06 .09 .12# .12+ .09 .14* SS & S .17* .19** .17* .18** .10 .09 .07 .12# .08 R2 .17 .18 .15 .18 .17 .16 .09 .14 .11 R2xs change .14 .15 .13 .15 .15 .13 .08 .02 .09 F change 19.07 19.51 17.04 20.51 19.77 16.89 9.43 2.61 11.66 # p < 0.10 * p < 0.05 **p < 0.01. K & U=Knowledge and Understanding; SE & C=Self-expression and Communication with others; SS & S=Sense of self and Self-confidence; ME=Motivation Efficacy; GSE=Game Strategy Efficacy; TE=Technique Efficacy; CBE= Character Building Efficacy; TIB=Training and Instruction Behaviour; DB=Democratic Behaviour; PFB=Positive Feedback Behaviour; AB=Autocratic Behaviour; SSB= Social Support Behaviour.