Table 4. Within-subject ANOVA effects and Bonferroni-corrected post-hoc comparisons. Variables Effect / Post-hoc comparison F (df) p η2p dz [95% CI] PPO Time F(2, 54) = 2.45 0.096 0.083 Condition × Time F(4, 108) = 2.96 0.023 0.099 HLBP: Pre vs. 5 min 0.010 -0.61 [-1.03, -0.19] APO Time F(2, 54) = 2.23 0.117 0.076 Condition × Time F(4, 108) = 1.41 0.237 0.049 PV Time F(2, 54) = 4.21 0.020 0.135 Condition × Time F(4, 108) = 4.16 0.004 0.134 HLBP: Pre vs. 5 min 0.002 -0.74 [-1.18, -0.30] HLBP: 5 vs. 10 min 0.022 0.55 [0.13, 0.96] AV Time F(2, 54) = 1.53 0.225 0.054 Condition × Time F(4, 108) = 2.51 0.046 0.085 TTPPO Time F(2, 48) = 1.33 0.275 0.052 Condition × Time F(2.41, 57.89) = 1.19 (ε = 0.60) 0.317 † 0.047 TTPV Time F(2, 54) = 0.42 0.659 0.015 Condition × Time F(4, 108) = 1.70 0.156 0.059 PPO: peak power output; APO: average power output; PV: peak velocity; AV: average velocity; TTPPO: time to peak power output; TTPV: time to peak velocity; HLBP: High-Load Bench Press; BMT: Ballistic Medicine-Ball Throw; CC: Control Condition; η2p: partial eta-squared; dz: Cohen’s d for paired samples; CI: confidence interval; ε: Greenhouse–Geisser epsilon. Within-condition post-hoc comparisons are Bonferroni-corrected paired-samples t-tests. Bold values indicate statistical significance (p < 0.05); the exploratory outcomes (AV, TTPPO and TTPV) are not marked. † Greenhouse–Geisser-corrected p-value with corrected fractional degrees of freedom, applied where Mauchly’s test indicated a violation of sphericity.