Athletes are required to spend a prolonged period of time at moderate altitude (2000 – 3000 m (Bartsch et al., 2008)) in order to accumulate a sufficient total hypoxic “dose” to stimulate erythropoiesis (Garvican et al., 2012). Indeed, current guidelines for simulated altitude exposure suggest that athletes should spend ~ 14 h·day⁻¹ at 3000 m for 3 weeks (totalling ~ 300 hours of exposure) in order to observe a mean increase in haemoglobin mass (Hb_mass) of 3 – 5% (Saunders et al., 2013). Likewise, a similar response may be achieved when 300 hours of exposure is accumulated at natural altitude (Garvican et al., 2012). Closer investigation of the time course of erythropoietic adaptation indicates that Hb_mass increases approximately 1% per 100 hours of exposure at simulated or natural altitude of 2300 to 3000 m (Clark et al., 2009; Garvican et al., 2012). However, achieving such altitude exposures is often difficult for athletes due to limited availability of appropriate simulated or natural altitude, decreased living/sleeping and training quality (especially at altitudes above 3000 m), and interference with training or competition schedules (Neya et al., 2013).

To date, several models of hypoxic exposure have been established including; live high/train high (LHTH); live high/train low; live low/train high (i.e. intermittent hypoxic exposure during training) or intermittent hypoxic exposure at rest (McLean et al., 2014; Millet et al., 2013; Millet et al., 2010 ). The possible physiological and performance benefits of each of these modes of altitude exposure differ considerably with contributing factors including, normobaric vs hypobaric exposure (Saugy et al., 2014), the total elevation of exposure and the duration of exposure (Gore et al., 2013). Indeed, clear relationships exist between the dose of altitude exposure (measured as total duration (Bonetti and Hopkins, 2009; Gore et al., 2013), increases in Hb_mass and/or associated improvements in aerobic capacity (Schmidt and Prommer, 2010).

Natural low altitude venues attract a considerable number of athletes each year with the common belief that even ‘low’ altitude (< 2000 m) contributes favourably to athlete performance at sea-level (Gore et al., 2007). Supporting this, three weeks of classical (LHTH) altitude exposure at 1300 m and 1650 m interspersed with three weeks of sea level training has been shown to result in an increase in Hb_mass and erythropoietin concentration (Frese and Friedmann-Bette, 2010; Saunders et al., 2009). Likewise, four weeks of LHTH altitude exposure at 1900m has been reported to result an increase in left ventricular mass and improved aerobic capacity in six of seven elite skiers (Siebenmann et al., 2012). Conversely, current scientific recommendations would suggest that natural altitude exposure below (< 2000 m) is too low to stimulate significant erythropoietic benefit (Pottgiesser et al., 2009; Wilber, 2007). Despite this, little is known as to the minimal hypoxic dose required for erythropoiesis and thus the mechanism responsible for a possible increase in performance with low altitude is unclear. Indeed, current literature suggests that a minimum of two weeks of classic altitude exposure above 2100 m is required in order to observe improvements in Hb_mass (Gore et al., 2013).

It is plausible that improvements in performance following altitude exposure may be associated with altered training or the favourable belief that altitude training has been successful, rather than haematological alterations. Indeed, it has been suggested that placebo effects and/or a better training environment (i.e. high-quality training camps, increased focus on training and recovery, less distractions, change of venue, and people to train with on a consistent basis) may be responsible for some of the improvements in performance observed within altitude exposure research (Saunders et al., 2009; 2010; Siebenmann et al., 2012). Clearly, further research is warranted in order to examine the possible haematological alterations of low altitude exposure in order to assess the effectiveness of such exposure. As such, the aim of the present study was to examine the effects of 3 weeks of live high, train high exposure (LHTH) at low natural altitude (i.e. Perisher Valley, 1800 m) on Hb_mass, red blood cell count and iron profile in elite distance runners.

Age, body mass, as well as pre-exposure Hb_mass were not significantly different between LHTH and CONTROL (Table 1). All subjects in the CONTROL group completed the 3 weeks of prescribed training. In the LHTH group, 8 subjects completed 2 weeks but due to personal commitments only 5 subjects completed the entire 3 weeks of exposure. The increase in Hb_mass from baseline was significantly greater in LHTH, compared with CONTROL, at both 2 (P=0.01) and 3 weeks (p = 0.02) following exposure (Figure 1).

A significant interaction effect was observed for Condition and Time in Hct (p < 0.01; Table 2). Post hoc comparisons revealed that Hct was greater in LHTH than CONTROL at 2 (p = 0.01) and 3 weeks (p = 0.04) of exposure (Table 2). Reticulocyte count was significantly greater in LHTH compared with CONTROL at 2 (p = 0.02) but not at 3 weeks (p = 0.27) of exposure. No significant interactions were observed for [Hb] (P=0.06), serum ferritin (p = 0.43), transferrin (p = 0.52) or reticulocyte expressed as a percentage (p = 0.16).

The present study found that 3 weeks of LHTH (i.e. classic) altitude exposure at just 1800 m was sufficient to induce a significant increase in Hb_mass in elite distance runners. This finding is of interest because it is generally considered that natural altitude exposure below 2000 m is insufficient to stimulate significant erythropoietic benefit (Pottgiesser et al., 2009; Wilber, 2007).

We observed a 3.0% increase in Hb_mass following three weeks of LHTH altitude exposure at 1800 m. This significant increase in Hb_mass was also associated with an increase in reticulocyte count and Hct, compared with the CONTROL group, within the first two weeks of the LHTH altitude exposure. Such an increase in Hb_mass is somewhat consistent with previous research showing that three weeks of classical altitude training at 1300 m and 1650 m interspersed with three weeks of sea level training resulted in an increased red blood cell volume, Hb_mass and serum EPO concentration (Frese and Friedmann-Bette, 2010). But, our results are contrary to those of Rasmussen et al. (2013), who concluded from a comprehensive meta-analysis that exposure to natural altitude must exceed two weeks at 4000 m to observe a statically significant effect. On the other hand, our findings also support the recent conclusions surrounding the time course of erythropoietic adaptation of a 1% increase per 100 hours of exposure when exposed to either natural or simulated moderate altitudes (Clark et al., 2009; Garvican et al., 2012). A recent meta-analysis by Gore et al., (2013) examined Hb_mass changes following a variety of hypoxic doses (including LHTH studies ranging from 10-28 days) and determined that during altitude exposure Hb_mass increased at a rate of ~1.1% per 100 hours for both LHTH and live-high train-low altitude exposure; with the response at 2200 m natural altitude being just as effective as at 3000 m simulated altitude provided the total hours of exposure are matched. Notably, within the present study, the majority of the increase in Hb_mass was observed within the first two weeks of altitude exposure (Figure 1). The meta-analysis of Gore et al. (2013), predicts an additional ~2% increase in Hb_mass in the third week, which was not observed. Regardless, our current results identify 1800 m as a suitable threshold altitude for LHTH for increased red blood cell production and also reinforce the efficacy of LHTH since it provides continuous exposure to hypoxia.

Given that the present study examined low altitude exposure, it is also salient to examine the total hypoxic dose as calculated by hours of exposure multiplied by altitude height. Within this study the LHTL group accumulated 336 hours of exposure at 1800 m after 2 weeks and 504 h after 3 weeks, which equates to 604,800 AU and 907,200 AU, respectively. Interestingly, the recent study of Ryan et al. (2014) reported a 3.7% increase in Hb_mass after 7 days at 5260 m, which equates to 883,680 AU, with the magnitude of increase in Hb_mass somewhat comparable to the 3.0% increase for 907,200 AU observed in this study. It should be noted that this conceptual model for the determination of hypoxic dose assumes linear relationships between changes in Hb_mass and increasing altitude height or duration of exposure. While this is unlikely, this model improves on previous models quantifying altitude dose which typically focus on the duration of exposure alone (Gore et al., 2013). Clearly, further research is needed in order to better understand the the dose-response relationship of Hb_mass at altitude, along with titrating the minimally effective altitude. Indeed, with training intensities even less compromised, it may be beneficial to examine Hb_mass responses at even lower altitudes (1300-1600 m) (Frese and Friedmann-Bette, 2010) for athletes who only have access to such low lying altitudes venues.

Although planned, performance data are unavailable for this study due to the timing of altitude exposure and athlete’s specific training and racing schedules. Due to unforeseen circumstances some athletes could not and did not race as planned on their return to sea level while others engaged in a consecutive bout of altitude training a few weeks following this study and thus due to a number of confounding variables affecting individual results a true measure of performance could not be formulated. However, our group has previously acknowledged the challenges of demonstrating that small changes in Hb_mass translate in to a performance benefit (Gore, 2014).

The results of this study have illustrated that it is possible for athletes to expect a ~ 3% increase in Hb_mass after only 14 days of LHTH training at 1800 m. This lowers by ~200 m the threshold altitude considered sufficient to increase red blood cell production. Given the that accelerated red blood production seems to depend on the total dose of sufficient ‘altitude’ our results highlight that LHTH is the most time efficient modality for athletes and coaches to consider, because it provides 24 hour per day exposure to hypoxia, provided that sufficient total hours can be accumulated.