Research article - (2016)15, 585 - 591
Accelerometer Load Profiles for Basketball-Specific Drills in Elite Players
Xavi Schelling1, Lorena Torres1,2,
1Complex Systems in Sport Research Group SGR, National Institute of Physical Education of Catalonia (INEFC), University of Lleida, Spain
2Department of Health and Kinesiology, Exercise and Sport Nutrition Lab, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA

Lorena Torres
✉ Department of Health and Kinesiology Exercise and Sport Nutrition Lab, Texas A&M University College Station, Texas, USA
Email: lorenatorres07@yahoo.es
Received: 18-02-2016 -- Accepted: 15-08-2016
Published (online): 01-12-2016

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study was to quantify the workload during basketball-specific drills measured through microtechnology. Twelve professional male basketball players from the Spanish 1st Division were monitored over a 4-week period. Data were collected from 16 sessions, for a total of 95 ± 33 drills per player. Workload data (Acceleration load; AL) were obtained from a tri-axial accelerometer at 100Hz sampling frequency, and were expressed over time (AL.min-1). Comparisons among training drills (i.e., 2v2, 3v3, 4v4, and 5v5) were assessed via standardized mean differences. Full-court 3v3 and 5v5 showed the highest physical demand (AL.min-1: 18.7 ± 4.1 and 17.9 ± 4.6, respectively) compared with other traditional balanced basketball drills such as 2v2 and 4v4 (14.6 ± 2.8 and 13.8±2.5, respectively). The AL.min-1 on half-court showed trivial-to-moderate differences with a likely increase of ~10-20% in 2v2 drill compared with any other formats. This study provides insight into the specific requirements of a range of exercises typically performed in basketball sessions. The use of accelerometer data is presented as a useful tool in assessing the workload.

Key words: Acceleration, physical demands, training drills, monitoring, team sport

Key Points
  • Full-court 3v3 and 5v5 showed the highest external workload.
  • The smaller the player, the higher the raw acceleration load.
  • Systematic monitoring during training and competition would likely improve training prescription and periodization.








Back
|
Full Text
|
PDF
|
Share