Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
ISSN: 1303 - 2968   
Ios-APP Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
Androit-APP Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
Views
9394
Download
1133
from September 2014
 
©Journal of Sports Science and Medicine (2011) 10, 540 - 545

Research article
Physiological Responses to On-Court vs Running Interval Training in Competitive Tennis Players
Jaime Fernandez-Fernandez1,2, , David Sanz-Rivas2,3, Cristobal Sanchez-Muñoz2,4, Jose Gonzalez de la Aleja Tellez2,5, Martin Buchheit6, Alberto Mendez-Villanueva6
Author Information
1 Department of Training and Exercise Science, Faculty of Sports Science, Ruhr-University Bochum, Germany
2 Tennis Performance Research Group, Madrid, Spain
3 Faculty of Physical Activity and Sport Sciences, University Camilo Jose Cela, Madrid, Spain
4 Faculty of Physical Activity and Sport Sciences, University of Granada, Spain
5 Policlinica MAPFRE, Spain
6 Physiology Unit, Sport Science Department, ASPIRE Academy for Sports Excellence, Doha, Qatar

Jaime Fernandez-Fernandez
✉ Ruhr Universität Bochum; Trainingswissenschaft, Stiepeler Str. 129 UHW/825, 44801 Bochum, GERMANY
Email: Jaime.fernandez-fernandez@rub.de
Publish Date
Received: 18-05-2011
Accepted: 19-07-2011
Published (online): 01-09-2011
 
 
ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to compare heart rate (HR), blood lactate (LA) and rate of perceived exertion (RPE) responses to a tennis-specific interval training (i.e., on-court) session with that of a matched-on-time running interval training (i.e., off-court). Eight well-trained, male (n = 4) and female (n = 4) tennis players (mean ± SD; age: 16.4 ± 1.8 years) underwent an incremental test where peak treadmill speed, maximum HR (HRmax) and maximum oxygen uptake (VO2max) were determined. The two interval training protocols (i.e., off- court and on-court) consisted of 4 sets of 120 s of work, interspersed with 90 s rest. Percentage of HRmax (95.9 ± 2.4 vs. 96.1 ± 2.2%; p = 0.79), LA (6.9 ± 2.5 vs. 6.2 ± 2.4 mmol·L-1; p = 0.14) and RPE (16.7 ± 2.1 vs. 16.3 ± 1.8; p = 0.50) responses were similar for off-court and on-court, respectively. The two interval training protocols used in the present study have equivalent physiological responses. Longitudinal studies are still warranted but tennis-specific interval training sessions could represent a time-efficient alternative to off-court (running) interval training for the optimization of the specific cardiorespiratory fitness in tennis players.

Key words: Tennis, heart rate, blood lactate, rate of perceived exertion


           Key Points
  • On-court interval training protocol can be used as an alternative to running interval training
  • Technical/tactical training should be performed under conditions that replicate the physical and technical demands of a competitive match
  • During the competitive season tennis on-court training might be preferred to off-court training
 
 
Home Issues About Authors
Contact Current Editorial board Authors instructions
Email alerts In Press Mission For Reviewers
Archive Scope
Supplements Statistics
Most Read Articles
  Most Cited Articles
 
  
 
JSSM | Copyright 2001-2024 | All rights reserved. | LEGAL NOTICES | Publisher

It is forbidden the total or partial reproduction of this web site and the published materials, the treatment of its database, any kind of transition and for any means, either electronic, mechanic or other methods, without the previous written permission of the JSSM.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.