Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
ISSN: 1303 - 2968   
Ios-APP Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
Follow us
  
Views
33
Download
7
 
©Journal of Sports Science and Medicine ( 2026 )  25 ,  838  -  849   DOI: https://doi.org/10.52082/jssm.2026.838

Research article
Effects of 10% Versus 30% Velocity Loss Thresholds on Strength and Explosive Performance in Trained Female Collegiate Athletes: A Randomized Parallel-Group Trial
Xuehaiyue Lv1, Jingyuan Yang1, LinTao Suo1, Longkang Guo1, Mushuai Hao1, Haonan Qi1, Wei Han1, 
Author Information
1 School of Graduate Education, Shandong Sport University, Jinan, China
2 School of Competitive Sports, Shandong Sport University, Rizhao,China
3 School of Physical Education, Hebei Normal University, Shijiazhuang, China

Wei Han
✉ School of Competitive Sports, Shandong Sport University, Rizhao, China
Email: sdtyhw@163.com
Publish Date
Received: 01-08-2026
Accepted: 01-09-2026
Published (online): 01-12-2026
Narrated in English
 
 
ABSTRACT

This study compared the effects of 10% and 30% velocity-loss thresholds during Smith-machine squat training on maximal strength, jumping, and sprint performance in trained female collegiate athletes. Twenty-eight athletes were randomly assigned to a 10% velocity-loss group (VL10) or a 30% velocity-loss group (VL30).Both groups completed 8 weeks of supervised squat training twice weekly, performing four sets at 70% of one-repetition maximum, with each set terminated when the assigned threshold was reached. Smith-machine squat one-repetition maximum (1RM), squat jump (SJ), countermovement jump (CMJ), standing long jump (SLJ), and 30-m sprint (T30) performance were assessed before and after the intervention. Group × time effects were examined using mixed-design analyses of variance. Mean propulsive velocity was higher in VL10, whereas VL30 completed substantially more repetitions per set and per session (all p < 0.001). All performance outcomes improved over time (all p < 0.001). VL30 produced a greater increase in squat 1RM than VL10 (12.5% vs. 9.2%; interaction p < 0.001, ηp2 = 0.450). VL10 produced greater improvements in SLJ (interaction p = 0.031, ηp2 = 0.166) and T30 time (interaction p = 0.006, ηp2 = 0.254). Group × time interactions were not significant for SJ (p = 0.127) or CMJ (p = 0.058). Both thresholds improved strength and lower-body performance, but the adaptation pattern differed by outcome. Under the present protocol, VL30 favored 1RM squat strength, whereas VL10 favored SLJ and T30 performance.

Key words: Set termination, mean propulsive velocity, repetition volume, muscle fatigue, squat jump, sprinting


           Key Points
  • Eight weeks of Smith-machine squat training with either 10% or 30% velocity-loss (VL) thresholds produced significant improvements in squat strength, jumping and sprint performance among resistance-trained female collegiate athletes, but the two protocols triggered task-specific adaptive differences.
  • The 30% VL group achieved greater gains in maximal squat strength, whereas the 10% VL group showed greater improvements in SLJ and T30 performance; changes in vertical jump performance did not differ significantly between the two groups.
  • Practitioners should choose VL thresholds according to periodized training targets: 30% VL is recommended for maximal lower-body strength development, whereas 10% VL is more suitable for optimizing horizontal explosive power and sprint performance in female athletes.
 
 
Home Issues About Authors
Contact Current Editorial board Authors instructions
Email alerts In Press Mission For Reviewers
Archive Scope
Supplements Statistics
Most Read Articles
  Most Cited Articles
 
  
 
JSSM | Copyright 2001-2026 | All rights reserved. | LEGAL NOTICES | Publisher

It is forbidden the total or partial reproduction of this web site and the published materials, the treatment of its database, any kind of transition and for any means, either electronic, mechanic or other methods, without the previous written permission of the JSSM.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.